27 Comments
User's avatar
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

What's the opposite of "anti-vaxxer"?

Mass murderer.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

The definition of eugenics acted on I'd suggest.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

Same thing. Ray's version leaves little room for questions. ;)

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

*controlled opposition* can take a lot of analysis to see.

Because they do wake up early hesitant types, and then, of course they have developed trust and followers.

Thank you Rich for doing this research.

It might get a bit too hot though.

Are you the only person in the world questioning the motivation of these ostensibly good guys.

That Sage mutant's reaction to you was a wake up and listen up for me.

I'm not in on your *no such thing as a virus*, but why does your spreading that message result in having the attack dogs set on you.

It's like you are saying *There is no God*.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

No I'm not the only guy. Just the most targeted one.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

I am blocked by Kirsch. It is an honour.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Lots of claims here, no substance.

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/just-because-we-can-doesnt-mean-we

Looks like an attempt to ramp fear up and blame 12 well paid scientists who have nothing to do with decisions made at Pfizer in the service of profit and dividends.

I guess these here posts of ours will ramp up the panic on the other side a little more. When do we strike?

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Interesting. I can't remember actually counting those scientists before posting that. But it is indeed 12.

Anyway I have income to attend to.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

I have read very few Sage Hana posts but I have to admire how much self esteem she packs into them.... that takes a monumentally over-pumped balloon of an ego. Has to be seen to believed.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Comments are odd as well. Elizabeth has been in there trying to track down any logic to them.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

I liked Steve Kirsch for all of about 10 minutes. Then I realized he was full of poop. After repeated comments from many people about Steve's continued use of the term "vaccine," has his self-serving blather, I escaped from receiving his blahblahblog.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

I did too. Was originally subscribed but got sick of it.

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

To be fair to Kirsch he woke up to their scams a bit late. He was faccinated. We asked him to explain why. He ignored us.

Since his awakening, he was been brave and relentless. His output greater and superior to Berenson's.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

He's controlled opposition, it seems to me. I guess eventually time will tell.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Maybe controlled by the need to make money. His foundation has had a medical focus for quite a while and there's been money in repurposing off brand drugs for just as long. I doubt that there's any efficacy to Ivermecin or Hydroxochloroquine and maybe all of its promotors need to have their business interests a closer look.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

Hmmm, why would you doubt the efficacy of IVM or HCQ? I've read copious articles that celebrate the efficacy of both of them. They are both long-time inclusions on the Safe Drug List, and have been cheap and widely used, sold over-the-counter, etc.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Because there's nothing to treat.

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

Not so sure about that. If people are having flu-like symptoms, whatever you think the "flu" is, and the symptoms are eradicated by using HCQ or IVM, well... Seems like whatever is going on, those two treatments appear to help. Maybe it helps somehow with EMF poisoning. I may not believe in "viruses" but I do believe people suffer from things, even if it's a simple case of nutritional deficiency of some kind.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

I agree with the second part of that. I think work needs to be done on whether IVM & HCQ have any efficacy with whatever is causing these symptoms and if they do how do they.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

He's relentless elsewhere as well but If he wants to call off Hana et al then I might drop this one for now.

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

I don't think Kirsch has even heard of Sage Hanna. Why would he, unwisely, ask Hanna to continually jab you??

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Rubbish. It's as clear as daylight in Sages posts. 166 to 8 or 9 is not a trivial difference. it's a 2000% difference.

https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/stevsoz-sage-hana

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

I see....

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

166/8 = 2075% to be exact.

Is Martin Shkreli a pharmaceutical guy or not?

And if he is, is not someone else who's doing the same also part of the pharmaceutical industry.

One other question, why was Martin Shkreli targeted? It's not as if what he did had not been going on since at least the early 90s.

Expand full comment